One of the things that most people get, uh, kind of incorrect is that they’re like, oh, I’m trying to evaluate the politician based on what they believe. Well, actually the politician is supposed to represent what we believe as the people. And so, you know, the negative view of that is they’re pandering. They’re basically saying what we think, you know, they think we want to hear and then they’re gonna get off to do whatever they want. The positive view of it is no, they’re listening to their constituency and their constituency is telling them I want you to be pro Bitcoin. So the smart ones are saying I’m pro Bitcoin. Um And so, you know, regardless, yes, their campaign promises, promises is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence. Uh And so do they have to fulfill the promises? Not necessarily, uh, but I do think that there’s a lot of people who are going to go into the ballot box, they’re gonna say, well, I have two candidates that, uh, I’m voting for three candidates that I’m gonna evaluate and one of them is promising me something I like and the other is promising me something I don’t like, regardless of what they’re going to do, I can only evaluate the promises today. And so obviously I’m gonna go for the person who’s promising me a positive thing.
Credit: Source link
